RE: More on Validating documentation

Subject: RE: More on Validating documentation
From: "Stevenson, Rebecca" <Rebecca -dot- Stevenson -at- workscape -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:22:41 -0500

Eric wondered, "So, in your experience, are relationships with developers
really as non-existent or dysfunctional as some threads on
TECHWR-L would suggest?"

Nope. I've run into the occasional problem individual (IME, there's one in
every office, though I haven't found him/her at the new job yet <knock
wood>), but in my three tech writing positions so far I haven't encountered
anything like what I read about here so often. Though my precise role has
differed with each company, in none of them have I seen tech writers treated
in a way I consider objectionable. We are all in this together.

Rebecca Stevenson
Technical Writer
Workscape, Inc.

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Master Documents, with a side of Single Source Sauce
Next by Author: RE: How is life in these cities?
Previous by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation
Next by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads