RE: More on Validating documentation

Subject: RE: More on Validating documentation
From: "Barb Einarsen" <barb -dot- einarsen -at- nettest -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:39:47 -0500


Syed mentioned:
The head of development here feels that documentation for the software
we release is a component of what our end ("shippable") product should
be, and re-emphasized the importance of development and documentation
working closely together throughout the dev process.

I want to add to my previous note:
IMNSHO: Documentation is just another part of the product, similar to
the user interface. No more important. No less.

Barb

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: More on Validating documentation
Next by Author: RE: Tech Writing: The Second Generation (was Re: The Big Lie (was 'Are You a Writer?'))
Previous by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation
Next by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads