RE: Scientfically numbered documents (Gov. manuals)

Subject: RE: Scientfically numbered documents (Gov. manuals)
From: Jim Shaeffer <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:14:01 -0500


If you are truly talking about headings and sub-headings, the
advice given so far is sound.
If you are talking about a paragraph numbering scheme,
the rules may be different.
If you are indeed creating a Government Manual, the government
in question probably has a manual tellilng you how to to number
your manual.

Jim Shaeffer (jims -at- spsi -dot- com)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Some thoughts on knowledge management, content management and single sourcing
Next by Author: RE: More on Validating documentation
Previous by Thread: RE: Scientfically numbered documents (Gov. manuals)
Next by Thread: RE: Use of photos in documentation?THANKS TO ALL


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads