Re: More on Validating documentation

Subject: Re: More on Validating documentation
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:24:55 -0500


Bruce Byfield wrote:

>
>However (and I say this with no malice whatsoever, just observation), I
>believe that the main reason is that many programmers really don't care
>about the product as such. All that they want to do is write interesting
>code.

This came up in a conversation with our CEO (a wise manager even if he is a decade or so younger than we are). He suggested that the programmers who have left us are those whose primary interested is pushing the technology envelope and that those who have stayed accept the fact that we're not in that business. (We use proven, stable technology to develop products that embody innovative business logic.)

What I learned from the conversation is that this characteristic defines an axis along which you can categorize developers, which may help in deciding how to approach individual SMEs.

>But, on the whole, developers are a closed community of introverts. By
>comparison, writers are extroverts.

Uh, I don't think so. Some of us (maybe some of the most successful of us, maybe the ones you know and like) are extraverts. I suspect that the majority of tech writers fall on the introvert side of the median.

Dick

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: More on Validating documentation
Next by Author: he/she redux
Previous by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation
Next by Thread: RE: More on Validating documentation


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads