Re: Consequences of inadequate docs/training

Subject: Re: Consequences of inadequate docs/training
From: "Margaret Secara" <margaret -dot- secara -at- alphather -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:33:11 -0800

Certainly the manual should feature appropriate warnings in large friendly letters, but is anyone really sent into the field with just a weapon and a manual? "Here kid, don't blow yourself up."

Surely this kind of thing is addressed in training, too.

Maggie Secara

>I haven't seen any modern weapons manuals, but they must be full of
>warnings - e.g. "Don't call down an air strike within 50m of your position."
>"Establish positive identification before firing on target" and so on.
>So, how do you avoid overloading the manuals with warnings and cautions to
>the extent that you make the reader blasé or destroy their faith in the
>(This probably also applies to other critical real-time systems, e.g.
>medical software)

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: tracking writer progress on tight deadline?
Next by Author: Re: MS Weird Style & Autonumbering Mania (Help!)
Previous by Thread: Re: Consequences of inadequate docs/training
Next by Thread: Re: Consequences of inadequate docs/training

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads