Consequences of inadequate docs/training? (Take II)

Subject: Consequences of inadequate docs/training? (Take II)
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:40:06 -0500


Michael Feimster picked up on my original response, but I thought the
information might be interesting to other techwhirlers too:

<<GPS signals are deliberatlly degraded for civilian use. Military GPS
devices can be accurate to within a handful of meters. Civilian GPS devices
are accurate to anywhere from 50 to 150 meters. This was done to prevent
hostile forces from using GPS to guide bombs to their targets.>>

You're referring to "selective availability", in which the satellite signals
were scrambled using a key (whose nature escapes me) that military
transmitters could use to unscramble the results. This did indeed degrade
accuracy, but not as badly as you report, and the results varied based on
how many satellite signals could be received, the quality of the receiver,
and whether the receiver was being used in static or kinematic (moving)
positioning. 100-m accuracy is what you'd get with the US$100 receiver you'd
purchase at Radio Shack, but professional receivers do much better even in
civilian applications.

Military users now have devices such as laser-ring gyroscopes available to
produce inertial navigation systems backed by GPS with accuracies of
centimetres, even while moving. Civilian tech such as the stuff we use in
forestry routinely achieves accuracy down to 1 m (ranging up to 15 m under
really bad conditions) using a technique called "differential correction",
which can be done in real-time (for navigation) or back at the office (for
surveying). Moreover, these results are now sometimes achievable without
differential correction under optimal conditions because "selective
availability" was eliminated last year (May?).

<<In a former life I use to navigate ships in the Coast Guard. We never used
GPS to navigate in a harbor, let alone in the fog, or in the dark.>>

This may have changed. The Canadian Coast Guard now broadcasts differential
correction information via radio beacons to assist navigation. The
information is apparently now available to anyone travelling along the main
navigable waters in Canada, permitting accuracy to well below 5 m. I'm not
sure I'd want to navigate anywhere really tight with that technology, and
particularly not where movable objects such as shoals are concerned, but
it's only a matter of time before this becomes possible. Accuracy has
increased enormously even over the few years I've been involved in editing
research reports on this technology; it's only going to get better as the
math and the electronics improve.

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a
personality, and an obnoxious one at that."—Kim Roper

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: If you had to teach (Take II)?
Next by Author: MS Weird style & autonumbering mania (help!)?
Previous by Thread: Sideheads
Next by Thread: WinHelp master TOC not opening


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads