RE: Why Lurk?

Subject: RE: Why Lurk?
From: "Dan Hall" <dhall -at- san-carlos -dot- rms -dot- slb -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:48:58 -0500

And don't forget "Humorous Techwr-l posts: the Achilles'
heel of serious tech writers"



Have something to say, and say it as clearly as you
can. That is the only secret of style. - Matthew Arnold

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-72045 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-72045 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Jane
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Why Lurk?

Susan W. Gallagher
>And thanks, Jane & Arlen, for the straight
>skinny on the expression "Parthian shot".

Next week: Pyrrhic victories in Extreme Programming environments.
Plus: Dot-Coms - How to work with the Sword of Damocles over your head.

Jane Carnall
Apologies for the long additional sig: it is added automatically and outwith
my control.


Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Why Lurk?: From: Jane Carnall

Previous by Author: FW: New tool wars! WAS: Pinsky poem in the Atlantic "Jar of Pens"
Next by Author: RE: Palm Docs
Previous by Thread: RE: Why Lurk?
Next by Thread: RE: Why Lurk?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads