RE: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?

Subject: RE: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:34:54 -0400


You're taking it personally. Don't. Editors are often times terse and
will mark up every detail that doesn't conform to their standards.

You've only been there for five weeks. You will learn what the editors
want to see and over time the returned copy will be less and less red.

Having an editor is a damn good thing. Do your job (content creation)
and let them do theirs (editing).

Just out of curiosity, do others have issues with the editors? Have you
talked to others? Have you talked to the editors? Have you tried not to
let it bother you, and be civil about discussing the situation at work?
I'm sure they know you have a hard deadline to meet, and I'm sure they
know you only had a few weeks to write the manual. Talk to them. Play
nice. Be happy you have an editing staff.

B I L L S W A L L O W
Information Design & Development Professional
tel/fax: 518.371.1867 bill_swallow -at- yahoo -dot- com
List Owner: HATT, WWP-Users, InFrame
Co-Moderator: SingleSourcing-Mgmt
WebWorks Wizard Editor of InFrame Magazine

::: -----Original Message-----
::: I've been at this company for about 5 weeks, and apart from
::: trying my darndest to meet next to impossible deadlines,
::: I've had to deal with something that I've never had to deal
::: with before. Our editors seem to have the attitude of: "We
::: need to punish those naughty writers." And believe me,
::: punish they do. For example, I recently received a document
::: that not only had tons of "slash and burn" comments(and
::: yes, I know my own weaknesses), but the tone was tense and
::: terse. Also, our editors copy our managers, directors, and
::: anyone else they feel should look over the writer's work..."Sigh"
:::
::: I was under a complete illusion, that is I thought that
::: editors where here to help and to point out
::: inconsistencies, I was wrong! A writer must turn in a
::: completely clean doc, and if they don't *&$#!!! Never mind
::: that you may have had only a few weeks to write a 700 page
::: manual from scratch.
:::
::: Here's what burns in my mind. If all the writers turned in
::: completely clean docs, why have editors?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?: From: Worzel Gummidge

Previous by Author: RE: Word --> pdf = ugly underlines
Next by Author: RE: Merging WebHelp projects using RoboHelp Enterprise
Previous by Thread: Re: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?
Next by Thread: Re: An Editor's Role...To Punish the Writer?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads