RE: Ayn Rand

Subject: RE: Ayn Rand
From: bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:29:53 -0500

Actually, it was totally relevant to my comment about needing Andrew Plato back to tell everybody who was complaining what the business of businesses is. It was exactly what Rand had to say about the situation. The only people who fail to see the connection are those who don't know what Rand really said and are merely taking the word of somebody else that what she wrote was some great evil.

Kinda ties into the eternal debate about needing the SMEs to spoon feed you the information, doesn't it?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Broman [mailto:broman -at- acm -dot- org]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Westbrook, Bryan
Subject: RE: Ayn Rand

It was hardly relevant. The discussion of Rand started in response to Keith
Cronin's statement, "America. It's about entitlement, baby." No connection
was ever made between Rand and the thread, labeled "SLAVE labor? (etc.),"
although it, and everything else, fits under "etc."

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Ayn Rand
Next by Author: RE: Tech reviewers doing their job?
Previous by Thread: RE: Ayn Rand
Next by Thread: RE: Ayn Rand

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads