RE: Content Management

Subject: RE: Content Management
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 22:36:54 -0400

Database solutions do work, but CMS brings a lot more to the table...
It's easy enough to cobble together a database for documentation use,
but to track the revisions/additions/deletions can be a nightmare...
Which is why CMS is so popular these days...

Information Design & Development Professional
tel/fax: 518.371.1867 bill_swallow -at- yahoo -dot- com
List Owner: HATT, WWP-Users, InFrame
Co-Moderator: SingleSourcing-Mgmt
WebWorks Wizard Editor of InFrame Magazine

::: -----Original Message-----
::: I agree with you completely, Dick. Storing the documents in
::: a database is an
::: excellent idea and, as you point out, relatively simple to
::: implement. And,
::: especially for marketing documents, the ability to search
::: based on keywords
::: in the document titles could be quite beneficial.

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
Save $600: Create great-looking Help files and software demos with
RoboHelp Deluxe. Get RoboHelp and RoboDemo - our new demo software - for one
low price. OR Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in June with our mail-in rebate.
Go to
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Content Management: From: Suzanne Chiles

Previous by Author: RE: Content Management
Next by Author: RE: Distiller settings
Previous by Thread: Re: Content Management
Next by Thread: Re: Content Management

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads