An observation about INTERCOM

Subject: An observation about INTERCOM
From: "David Downing" <DavidDowning -at- users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:37:41 -0400

The recent criticism of the INTERCOM article reminded me of another
thing I've noticed about a number of their articles, and I was wondering
if anyone else has noticed it. They seem to assume that the reader is a
totally autonomous being who an do whatever he/she pleases with
documentation or at his/her place of employment.

One example is in the most recent issue -- the article on marcom
writing, which kind of makes it sound like you can just take a notion to
breeze on over to the advertising department and work there for awhile.
Another was an article on using various types of rhetoric in your
documentation. This assumes you can just do your own thing with the
documentation and never mind your company's style guide.

Anybody else noticed this?

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Next by Author: DON'T DO IT!!!
Previous by Thread: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line?
Next by Thread: Re: An observation about INTERCOM

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads