RE: Average hours worked

[kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com]

Jane wrote:

> It's amazing. Not everyone can rejoin a list after months away and instantly
> derail a relevant thread into complete irrelevancies, then be hailed by even
> a handful of people as if this were good news.


How is it "derailed"? 

We're staying on the topic (hours worked), and a variety of viewpoints is
being discussed. That's what I thought this list was about. I think it's
pretty interesting, as do a few others, apparently.

You've made it public knowledge that you're not a fan of one of the recent
participants in this thread, but I don't see how his posts have in any way
damaged this thread OR yourself, other than to remind you that he still
exists, despite your prayers to the contrary. :)


Keith Cronin
who welcomes a breath of life being breathed into this list. 
Even if it smells like onions.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations
at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/abouttechwhirl/donate.html

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.