RE: Why ISO 9000 really sucks

Subject: RE: Why ISO 9000 really sucks
From: cruddy -at- optushome -dot- com -dot- au
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 18:49:57 -0600

Just being ISO doesn't make a process any better and there are numerous
counter-arguments to every case. However, ISO's relative importance in the
world stems from a simple and common requirement.

In order to have Quality Output you require Quality Inputs. If you
purchase supplies from Q companies you do not need to run a QA on them
yourself. So a Q company prefers to have Q companies as suppliers to give
them a seamless Q process.

Steve Hudson - Word Heretic, Sydney, Australia
"Player One needs more work... badly"
Freelance teacher, trainer, tutor, writer
Email: heretic -at- tdfa -dot- com Word and other FAQs at
You agree by writing to me personally that any material can be reused
publicly unless you explicitly disclaim it. (For Blog and List Use)

Want to support TECHWR-L? Get shirts, bags, hats, clocks,
and more from the TECHWR-L Store. All proceeds support TECHWR-L.

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Book Recommendation? technical illustrations and screenshots
Next by Author: Re: Word Macros, Toolbars and Screentips
Previous by Thread: RE: Why ISO 9000 really sucks
Next by Thread: TOC page in HTML help

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads