Re: Single-sourcing... Again...

Subject: Re: Single-sourcing... Again...
From: Goober <techcommgoober -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 07:38:06 -0700 (PDT)

> So its okay to burn up overtime setting up a
> single-sourcing system, but it would
> be unacceptable if your boss asked you to stay
> overtime to get some docs done?
> (Presumably using that very same system that you
> spent all this time to build.)

Andrew (and all),

I never once said I was aginst overtime. My issue was
companies expecting overtime as if it were regular
working hours (60 hours a week, every week). I have no
problem putting in overtime to get shtuff done when
needed. If it's needed all the time, there's a bigger
issue that needs to be dealt with.

I thought I made that painfully clear in my earlier posts.

Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: Single-sourcing... Again...: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: RE: agency markups - from a hirer's perspective
Next by Author: Re: Single-sourcing... Again...
Previous by Thread: Re: Single-sourcing... Again...
Next by Thread: Re: Single-sourcing... Again...

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads