RE: Terminology problem? (take II)

Subject: RE: Terminology problem? (take II)
From: Kim Roper <kim -dot- roper -at- vitana -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:00:30 -0400

jgarison wrote:

> Just
> as The Onion reported Clinton wanted to send vowels to
> Croatia, I thing we
> should wage a campaign for proper, traditional,
> you-know-where-you-stand names.

We'll get onto the project right after we agree on a time and date standard
and the number of spaces to use after a period :>

Cheers ... Kim
"Grandfather, what is Esperanto?"
"My boy, it's a universal language."
"Grandfather, where is it spoken?"
"Nowhere, my boy, nowhere."

Want to support TECHWR-L? Get shirts, bags, hats, clocks,
and more from the TECHWR-L Store. All proceeds support TECHWR-L.

Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Terminology problem? (take II)
Next by Author: RE: Regarding Statehood For Canada
Previous by Thread: Re: Terminology problem? (take II)
Next by Thread: RE: Terminology problem? (take II)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads