RE: funny job postings redux

Subject: RE: funny job postings redux
From: "Andrew Dugas" <dugas -at- intalio -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:02:23 -0700



> Oh, I don't blame them for trying. I do think
> that it would make more sense to list the more
> esoteric qualifications as desired, rather
> than stated or implied requirements. Back when
> I was looking, I learned to treat them that way
> anyway, but I worry about the proverbial other
> guy/gal, who reads these descriptions and weeps.
>
> --


Let 'em weep! Thins the herd of competition for the position.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations
at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/abouttechwhirl/donate.html

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: funny job postings redux: From: holmegm

Previous by Author: RE: funny job postings redux
Next by Author: RE: toc leader dots
Previous by Thread: RE: funny job postings redux
Next by Thread: Re: funny job postings redux


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads