RE: User's, Users, Users'

Subject: RE: User's, Users, Users'
From: "Andrew Dugas" <dugas -at- intalio -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:02:43 -0700

No, that's the book for how to work with the User product, rathr than a
guide for the User.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-techwr-l-88324 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
> [mailto:bounce-techwr-l-88324 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of
> Ballenberger Gerd
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:41 AM
> Subject: AW: User's, Users, Users'
> > (snip) why it should be User's, or Users, or Users'.
> I've even found "User Guide" when googling.
> This would eliminate the problem with the s, but adding a 4th
> version from
> which to choose, sorry ;>)

Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

AW: User's, Users, Users': From: Ballenberger Gerd

Previous by Author: RE: toc leader dots
Next by Author: RE: Techwriting history
Previous by Thread: AW: User's, Users, Users'
Next by Thread: re: Value of / requirement for user testing

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads