Re: taking too long

Subject: Re: taking too long
From: Andrew Plato <gilliankitty -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:21:09 -0700 (PDT)

"David Cooper" <> wrote in message news:171902 -at- techwr-l -dot- -dot- -dot-
> Here's a fun game -- find a paragraph in the most recent posting for this
> thread that does not include (a) a broad generalization about software
> developers, (b) a broad generalization about writers, or (c) a sarcastic or
> condescending statement of unreasoned opinion presented as empirical fact.
> Hmmmm...can't find one, can ya?
> I've seen more thoughtful exchanges on Jerry Springer. Anyone have anything
> _constructive_ to say?

Apparently not. All you are doing is offering a pointless meta-argument about how
the discussion fails to meet your exacting standards.

Why don't you actually present some counter arguments rather than just bitching.

Andrew Plato

Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More

All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at

Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade. Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250).

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Next by Author: Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Previous by Thread: RE: taking too long
Next by Thread: RE: taking too long

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads