Re: Good Manual Numbering Scheme?

[dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com]

David Knopf wrote:
> 
> ...if you must use Word, it's a little more robust to
> number with SEQ fields rather than doing it manually.


Oh, for Pete's sake.

I wasn't advocating a switch to Framemaker.  I'm the guy who *likes* Word, remember?  I actually posted detailed instructions for using SEQ fields, and helped a subscriber get her nested lists to work.

I was just making a joke.  Manual numbering.  Get it?

Let it go, people.

--David 

P.S.  In the context of a discussion of Word's automatic numbering, 
      using SEQ fields *is* manual numbering.
 
========================================================================

N O W   A V A I L A B L E !                http://www.html-indexer.com/

HTML Indexer 4 is still the easiest way to create and maintain indexes 
for web sites, intranets, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and other HTML documents.

Now with fully integrated cross-references, target frames and windows, 
multiple-file output, "one-step accept" of default entries, and more!

 


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade.  Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250).
http://www.componentone.com/d2hlist1002

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.