RE: TOC article in INTERCOM -- things that made me go "HUH??"

Subject: RE: TOC article in INTERCOM -- things that made me go "HUH??"
From: "David Downing" <DavidDowning -at- users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:56:43 -0500


<<I have seen where some TOCs do not list all headings. It stops at a
pre-specified level, say the fourth level head, because the information
at
the fifth, and later if present, levels of not of sufficient
consequence.>>

This type of omission isn't what I was talking about. In fact, we have
a similar policy, but we don't even take it this far. I was talking
about omitting some headings at a level you've chosen to include.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in December and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: How to make symbols stand out?
Next by Author: RE: Publish On Demand with Booklocker / Writer's Digest
Previous by Thread: RE: TOC article in INTERCOM -- things that made me go "HUH??"
Next by Thread: Editing marks - two questions?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads