Re: Employment history low points

Subject: Re: Employment history low points
From: stephen -dot- arrants -at- attbi -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:09:29 +0000


Ooo. I don't think so. Too many variables. You're not up against the same 100
people. The jobs are all the same. What the hiring folk are looking for isn't
the same.

The chances of being chosen for a job is related to your qualifications and
their needs, not false mathematics.
> (Mathematical factoid: If 100 people apply for a job, only 1 can be chosen.
> So, if you apply for 100 jobs, the chances are you will be chosen for one
> of them).


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 today and receive a $100 mail in rebate and a FREE
WebHelp Merge Module for merging multiple Help systems on any desktop
or server. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?
Next by Author: Re: Employment history low points
Previous by Thread: Re: Employment history low points
Next by Thread: Re: Employment history low points


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads