OT: OT

Subject: OT: OT
From: Mike Stockman <mstockman -at- mac -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:44:31 -0500


Not to pretend I'm the list police or anything, but one rule I've always
followed (well, until today) is that if I think I should put "OT:" before
my subject line, that's a good indication that I shouldn't send it at all.

Given that Eric just posted this morning that we should all get back on
topic, and given that I'm tired of deleting twenty messages at a time
that are all prefixed with "OT:" (gotta set up a rule to automate that,
the way I have for "ADV"), does anyone else think we can agree that OT
means "don't post"?

Hope this is helpful,
Mike





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Help Authoring Seminar 2003, coming soon to a city near you! Attend this
educational and affordable one-day seminar covering existing and emerging
trends in Help authoring technology. See http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.

A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Help! Need to reformat over 1000 *plain text* Word docs quickly
Next by Author: Re: OT: OT
Previous by Thread: Re: [stclwrsig-l] Re: ZIP Question (solved)
Next by Thread: Re: OT: OT


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads