RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?

Subject: RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?
From: "Stuart Rogers" <srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:31:24 -0500


Are you speaking of the conference evaluations, or a chapter Publications
Competition? (Sounds more like the latter to me, if there was an award.)

Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, Canada
+1 (416) 491-7340 x 325

mailto:srogers -at- phoenix-geophysics -dot- com

"On the contrary."
-- Henrik Ibsen (last words, after a nurse said he "seemed a little
better.")


-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-88731 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-88731 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com] On Behalf Of Spreadbury,
David C.
Sent: January 30, 2003 5:08 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?



I'm not a big advocate of the STC. I don't feel it is really a group
interested in technical content, but more layout and presentation.

Anyway, I just went through this with our local chapter.

Prior to the actual ceremony I got to talk with a couple of the document
reviewers. One of them, who happened to hit me in a negative manner with her
evaluation, appeared open to discussion and seemed to listen to my
explanation of why I chose to present the information the way it was
presented. She didn't really come down on me about it. It is a matter of
opinion how the information is presented, and she was open to that. As far
as the final evaluation sheet is concerned, I look at it as a way to improve
the next document. There were some things in the evaluation that showed me
where I may make the document more useable to the end user. This was in no
way a public humiliation. I looked at it as an opportunity to learn to
produce a better document.

BTW, the document that was submitted received an 'Award of Excellence',
which will look pretty good on my resume.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.

Help Authoring Seminar 2003, coming soon to a city near you! Attend this
educational and affordable one-day seminar covering existing and emerging
trends in Help authoring technology. See http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?: From: Spreadbury, David C.

Previous by Author: RE: High cost of print cartridges?
Next by Author: RoboHTML question
Previous by Thread: RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?
Next by Thread: RE: STC Conference: Manual Evaluations--valuable?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads