RE: Basic Voice ??s: OK for Software to "allow", "let", "enable", "pr ovide" and so forth?

Subject: RE: Basic Voice ??s: OK for Software to "allow", "let", "enable", "pr ovide" and so forth?
From: Watson Laughton <WLaughton -at- orphan -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:44:57 -0600

> Wrong: The fubar function lets you foul things up beyond all
> possibility of recovery.

Not sure I'm seeing what the problem is with saying that fubar "lets you
foul things up".


Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Credit check for interviews - was blocked
Next by Author: RE: Any pharmaceutical tech writers out there?
Previous by Thread: RE: Speaking of cookbooks...
Next by Thread: Naming conventions in a three-tiered system

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads