RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong

Subject: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 13:34:56 -0500


...what I mean. A few years ago I worked with a technical writer who got in
an argument with her engineer over what to call a part in a hardware
manual. She wanted to call this part a "fan," but he insisted that it be
called an "Air Moving Device," and use the acronym AMD. The technically
correct nomenclature was AMD, but most likely only an engineer (who works
at IBM) would know what an AMD is.
-------------------


I can only think of one reason to call it an "Air moving device". Chances
are, the customer could order replacement parts. If whoever wrote the parts
manual already used the term, then being consistent makes sense.

OTOH, if it didn't have bearing on it, then the engineer should have been
punished by having his slide rule and pocket protector taken away for a
month.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
NY: 212-414-6656
Dayton: 732-438-3372
"Alright, nobody move! I've got a dragon here, and I'm not afraid to use it"
---------- Donkey

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Order RoboHelp Office X3 by March 14 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
plus FREE WebHelp Merge Module and FREE iMarkup Software, for a
total giveaway value of $439! Order today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong, Pedantically Geeky?
Next by Author: RE: Calling a Bug a Bug
Previous by Thread: Re: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Next by Thread: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads