Re: A rant about ideas, not persons

Subject: Re: A rant about ideas, not persons
From: "Bill Sullivan" <billsull -at- connectnet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:34:11 -0700


Dick Margulis writes:

>However, it seems to me that we ought--as people who claim to be proficient
in some aspect of communication--to be able to agree on some basic ground
rules of discourse. At the very least, we might be able to avoid talking
past each other in mutually incomprehensible patois, as seems to be the
situation in the most recent contretemps.

Right you are. The subtext, if I see it correctly, reminds me of advice I
heard in the early days of my career: Don't take yourself so seriously.

Bill Sullivan



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/products/robohelp/


Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
A rant about ideas, not persons: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: RE: Glossary Insertions?
Next by Author: RE: How would you say...
Previous by Thread: Re: A rant about ideas, not persons
Next by Thread: New TECHWR-L Poll Question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads