TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Who cares about ethics? From:John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:57:24 -0400
Sean...you're talking to someone who spends a great deal of time in a state
where smoking is not illegal, but smoking indoors in ANY public place is.
I'm just saying that smoking should not be included into a discussion on
ethics...it cheapens the subject of ethics, which I spent a great deal of
time studying in college (I was going to go into the medical field and the
subject of ethics and human experimentation was a special interest..infact,
I was heading toward that subject for my thesis). Somehow, I don't think
that Immanuel Kant had smoking in mind when he wrote THE METAPHYSICAL
ELEMENTS OF ETHICS in the seventeen hundreds.
Senior Technical Writer
jposada -at- book -dot- com
Although she lives with seven other men, she's not easy.
------ Magic Mirror
From: Sean Brierley [mailto:seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: Who cares about ethics?
No, I did not. Smoking is not illegal, though, and I
suppose discriminating against smokers is not, either.
What if I don't like pregnent women? People who eat
doughnuts? People who drink beer?
And, actually, practice was to work "smoking" into the
conversation to actively determine whether candidates
smoked, so they could be weeded out.
--- John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:
> >Witnessing an employer refusing to hire a
> >well-qualified candidate because they were a
> I think we need to differentiate between ethics and
> your preferences. Not
> hiring a smoker hardly qualifies as an ethics
> transgression. He didn't like
> smokers. Did you ask why.
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/products/robohelp/
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.