RE: "found" TW humor (low)

Subject: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:19:40 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:09:46 -0400, "Doug Grossman"

> I would have to disagree that physical intimacy, if it
> is being engaged in for all the right reasons (being
> love comes to mind first, of course), would be the
> lowest form of interaction between women and men.
> Or is that not what you were saying?

Sex is good!

Maybe it's my being a college kid in the Sixties.
Whatever it is, "bang" is a horrible word with horrible
associations. Its use in my experience is usually
involved with describing sex sith prostitutes or sluts.

But enough of this uplifting talk.

Let's kill this thread before Eric is sufficiently
annoyed to do it himself. <g>


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Author: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
Previous by Thread: RE: "found" TW humor (low)
Next by Thread: RE: "found" TW humor (low)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads