RE: Reader responsibility

Subject: RE: Reader responsibility
From: "Lisa Wright" <liwright -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 23:13:08 -0700

Of course it is, but do you honestly think that your audience analysis
can account for every past experience/value of every member of your
audience? Respectfully, I doubt it, no matter how thorough you are.


-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-53104 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-53104 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com] On Behalf Of Stevenson,
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: Reader responsibility

>But we
writers should understand the total communication loop.

Isn't that why we do audience analysis?


Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Reader responsibility: From: Stevenson, Rebecca

Previous by Author: Reader responsibility
Next by Author: RE: Reader responsibility
Previous by Thread: RE: Reader responsibility
Next by Thread: RE: Reader responsibility

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads