RE: certification

Subject: RE: certification
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:28:01 -0400

::: I think the problem is that certification is being based on
::: existing tech
::: writer functions. Having them is fine. However, what if to
::: be certified, you
::: had to have certain advanced knowledge that only a certain
::: percentage of
::: existing writers have. Three examples are (there are many
::: others that can be
::: added):
::: - Project Management

A professional anything worth their salt should have at least minimal
project management skills.

::: - Process Analysis

Goes hand in hand with project management, IMO.

::: - Basics in Programming

You meant "Basics in [target industry]", right? ;)

Bill Swallow
wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com

Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: certification: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: RE: certification
Next by Author: RE: certification
Previous by Thread: RE: certification
Next by Thread: RE: certification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads