RE: alternative to the word module

Subject: RE: alternative to the word module
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:26:21 -0400

Tasks? I would never in my mind associate a piece of an application with
"task". I might be using an administrator module of an application to
perform a wide variety of tasks, some that I can do in perhaps a user module
as well.

I don't understand why a module can't be a module. What are we trying to
protect the readers from?

Bill Swallow
wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com

::: -----Original Message-----
::: Lisa Bronson in her email suggested the ideal term for me - tasks.
::: Programmers try to group similar features of an application
::: into module and
::: users will tend to relate to such a unit of an application
::: with the term
::: 'tasks'.

Last chance to order RoboHelp X3 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
PLUS free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module. Offer expires
4/30/03! Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: alternative to the word module: From: mark Dsouza

Previous by Author: RE: alternative to the word module
Next by Author: RE: Graphics within FrameMaker
Previous by Thread: Re: alternative to the word module
Next by Thread: Alternative to the word module?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads