Subject: RE: On PDFs
From: Watson Laughton <WLaughton -at- orphan -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:10:32 -0500

>>Oh, I forgot about that. It's an IE 6 bug, IIRC, that has a folks PO'd
>>on comp.text.pdf. And you're correct that a lot of people will run into
the same difficulty.

>>Again, your experience proves that there are a lot of people using Acrobat

>>poorly; it is not an indictment of the format, though.

If, as I have been told, the freebie AcroReader viewer (at least the _base_
version; I understand that you can specify to add onto the download the
ability to search PDFs, but this is not the default, and doesn't seem to be
what most people have if they're using the free reader), that limits the
utility of the format, no?

Last chance to order RoboHelp X3 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
PLUS free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module. Offer expires
4/30/03! Order here:

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: On PDFs
Next by Author: RE: On PDFs
Previous by Thread: RE: On PDFs
Next by Thread: RE: On PDFs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads