RE: Orphan headers - FOLLOWUP

Subject: RE: Orphan headers - FOLLOWUP
From: "Stevenson, Rebecca" <Rebecca -dot- Stevenson -at- workscape -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:34:53 -0400

Thanks, everyone who responded (there were lots!)!!

The consensus, supported by Chicago among others, is that one should avoid single sub-heads unless the material somehow insists on it. I will therefore be judicious in calling attention to these while performing peer edits, but I will do so if I think necessary.

Thanks again!



Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Orphan headers
Next by Author: RE: Orphan headers
Previous by Thread: Re: Attention job seekers--so you sent a resume and nobody acknowledged it, right?
Next by Thread: RE: FW: Exploitation is a two-way street (was a bunch of other th read--- s)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads