Re: Orphan headers

Subject: Re: Orphan headers
From: kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:59:41 -0600

I always felt bad for orphan headers, until I learned from Sally Struthers
that we can feed and clothe these poor unfortunates for only pennies a
day. <g>

Seriously, I think the rule you're talking about is one of those "because
we've always done it that way" conventions, and not worth making a big
deal about - trust me, your readers will NOT care. I'm much more in favor
of fitting the format to my content than vice versa, particularly when
trying to conform to a seemingly arbitrary rule starts costing me time and
effort in unneccessary text juggling.

Same with stacked headings. I say stack 'em.

Just another example of how I live on the edge.

Keith Cronin
don't even think you're ready to party with me until you've stacked a few
headings and maybe even split an infinitive or two.


Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: FW: Exploitation is a two-way street (was a bunch of other thread--- s)
Next by Author: Re: Hit the road
Previous by Thread: Orphan headers
Next by Thread: RE: Orphan headers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads