RE: Stereotypes (WAS: what to look for in a Tech Editor)

Subject: RE: Stereotypes (WAS: what to look for in a Tech Editor)
From: Valerie Priester <hammerl -at- buffalo -dot- edu>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 14:22:50 -0400

--On Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:24 AM -0700 "Mike O." <obie1121 -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

A brief story: I recently finished some heavy technical docs which I
accomplished solely by reading thousands of lines of code, documenting
data structures and business rules. Then I moved on to documenting
internals of the enterprise servers by reading their config files and
vendor docs. So I felt my tech credentials were pretty solid.

Then there was a reorg and there is new management at multiple levels.
When I introduced myself as a tech writer, I got one of those looks.
And on the new org chart, I am listed as the 'Project Librarian' which
made my day. I am still trying to get my hair into a bun, but it's not
working. At the development meetings, now I can crack them up just by
saying "Sssshhhhh!"

You have a problem being mistaken for someone with an advanced degree who has a knowledge of everything from MARC records and OCLC to computer networking, hardware and software installs, information architecture, and end-user documentation? Wow. I know what you're trying to say, that you've done all these really techie-techie projects and you felt it was a big put-down, but I think your vision of librarians went out with the horse and buggy. To be honest, having earned my Master of Library Science in 1999 I'm a little put off by your assessment. My job as a technical writer requires fewer qualifications than if I were to accept a job as a librarian. Talk about stereotypes.

Valerie Priester
hammerl -at- buffalo -dot- edu


Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order RoboHelp today:

ATTENTION FrameMaker Users: Fill-out the following survey to receive a chance to win a FREE RoboScreenCapture.
FM users only please:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Stereotypes (WAS: what to look for in a Tech Editor): From: Mike O.

Previous by Author: RE: URGENT: Immediate ethical issue
Next by Author: RE: What to look for in a technical editor
Previous by Thread: RE: Stereotypes (WAS: what to look for in a Tech Editor)
Next by Thread: RE: Stereotypes (WAS: what to look for in a Tech Editor)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads