RE: What to look for in a technical editor

Subject: RE: What to look for in a technical editor
From: "Anuradha Biswas" <anuradhab -at- sct -dot- co -dot- in>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:16:26 +0530


A couple of thoughts on this:

1. As part of the documentation cycle, all documentation goes through a couple of rounds of tech reviews - one by the Project Lead who understands the function/security/constraints/restrictions. Ant he other by a Product Manager who understands the business logic the best. At the end of these two, the documentation must be functionally and logically as accurate as possible.
2. The first round of edit reviews concentrate on individual functions/topics. They largely go over the structure, concepts, procedures, style guide compliance etc for individual topics.
3. The last and final round of tech reviews happen on compiled documents. These include reviewing the structure as a whole, the TOC, index, glossary, links, navigation etc.

Typically it is not possible/practical for a doc team to have several functional/product experts who are also reviewers. We solve a lot of problems by having functional presentations at the beginning of a product release. The writer understands and 'presents' several complex and critical functions to a varied audience. This is built into the doc plan. The reviewer gets a chance to understand the core concepts behind functions he/she is expected to review finally. This helps when reviewing documents for structure, content etc.

With language reviews there is always scope for improvement no matter how well edited. Grammar and punctuation are the easiest to get by. Between two editors, I have always found issues in terms of how much to edit and how much to treat as subjective and leave it at that. If its not inaccurate, and meets the requirements of the style guide, then let it be. There is also a question of individual writing styles which get pretty much stifled with so many rules, dos and donts.

Anu Biswas
www.sct.com
India





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Term for elegant, efficient, tight code?
Next by Author: Help with software
Previous by Thread: Re: What to look for in a technical editor
Next by Thread: Re: What to look for in a technical editor


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads