RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?

Subject: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
From: Sean Brierley <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT)


But, then, your content is updated, your text moves,
what was on one page now spans two or is on a new page
facing a difference page . . . and you have to undo
or redo your customizations either to fix the ensuing
ugliness or to apply new balance schemes . . ..

Does creating overrides to feather pages improve
readability? Does it help convey information? And,
then you go and deliver HTML to someone whose 19-in.
monitor is running 1600x1200 ppi desktop size and
someone else who is running 640x480 and the layout
precision escapes notice . . ..

You could, of course, create paragraph styles called,
Override2pt, Override4pt, Override6pt, etc., each of
which is designed to be blank and, like a precision
washer, add a specific gap wherever installed.

Cheers,

Sean


--- Dick Margulis <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net> wrote:
>
> <grumble>
> Gene raises an interesting issue. Back when page
> make-up was a manual process (whether we are talking
> about foundry type, hot metal, or RC paper), we had
> the equivalent of style definitions, and we had
> rules for making up pages. The first rule was that
> facing pages had to have the same depth (except for
> first and last pages, of course, which had their own
> rules).
>
> In facing pages that contained things like breaks,
> subheads, numbered or bulleted lists, tables,
> figures, etc., the person making up the page
> adjusted the various spaces, in a proportional and
> subtle way, to make the depth. So the verso page,
> with two number 1 subheads might have a few points
> more lead above each of those subheads than the
> recto page, which had three number 1 subheads, for
> example. Or the extra space was thrown in above the
> table on one page.

<snip>

> This did not require a special definition for a new
> style every time you wanted a slight spacing

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ANNOUNCING ROBOHELP STUDIO

RoboHelp Studio maximizes your Help authoring power by combining
RoboHelp Office and RoboDemo, so you can easily create professional
Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and demos.

Find out more about RoboHelp Studio at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Re: indexers--embedded indexing
Next by Author: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
Next by Thread: RE: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads