Re: for general discussion

Subject: Re: for general discussion
From: Victoria Camgros <vcamgros -at- persistence -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 12:30:42 -0700

At 12:06 PM 7/7/2003 -0700, Sean Hower wrote:

Just read this

Thought it was interesting. What's everyone take on this?

I'd love to know the makeup of the "British National Corpus". Also whether they intend to analyze the Gospel of Luke in translation and consider that valid.

Gee, someone should feed them some James Tiptree fiction.

Technical writing tie in: (in a related study) "But here's the catch: The actual identity of the author didn't matter. When women wrote for men's magazines, they wrote in the ''male'' style. ''It clearly was performance,'' Tannen notes. ''It didn't matter whether the author was male or female. What mattered was whether the intended audience was male or female.''"


Create professional Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and
demos with all new RoboHelp Studio. More at

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

for general discussion: From: Sean Hower

Previous by Author: RE: Nielsen and PDFs
Next by Author: RE: web services (new tech writer)
Previous by Thread: for general discussion
Next by Thread: Re: for general discussion

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads