Re: for general discussion

Subject: Re: for general discussion
From: Kerstin -dot- Molthagen -at- etas -dot- de
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:44:41 +0200

Hi all!

It's a pity everyone jumped at my "Antwort"...


I am still wondering whether such an analysis of a translated and/or edited
text will bring forth the author's gender or the translator's or editor's
gender. Neither of these problems were mentioned in the article. Any ideas

Victoria Camgros wrote:
>[...] "But here's the catch: The actual identity of the author didn't
>matter. [...] What mattered was whether the intended audience was male
>or female.''"

Victoria, I am still interested in the source for the study you mentioned



Create professional Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and
demos with all new RoboHelp Studio. More at

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: for general discussion
Next by Author: Antwort: RE: ADMIN: Civility and content
Previous by Thread: RE: for general discussion
Next by Thread: Distributed authoring using Word and Domino?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads