Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers

Subject: Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers
From: "Anameier, Christine A - Eagan, MN" <christine -dot- a -dot- anameier -at- usps -dot- gov>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:37:53 -0500

AP wrote:
"I believe that these numbers demonstrate that even a 1 post per day
limit would
not dramatically affect the grand majority of the list members. 93%
would not
be affected. Only a small fraction of the listmembers would see their

Yes, but some of the list's most interesting and/or helpful members
would be in that small fraction.

I would be deeply sorry to see Keith, Geoff, Bill, Bruce, John, Dick,
Maggie, Chuck, DaLy, and several others limited to one post a day (not
to mention an unnamed acerbic poster whose views I often disagree with,
but whose posts I usually enjoy). In fact, out of Guy's list of people
who posted more than once in that 24-hour period, there are VERY few
whom I'd rather hear less from.



sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required!

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: problems creating PS file - please help
Next by Author: Re: FWD: Getting started as a part-time freelancer
Previous by Thread: RE: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers
Next by Thread: Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads