RE: Active voice / passive voice studies

Subject: RE: Active voice / passive voice studies
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:18:51 -0400


>>OK, we all know that it's better to use active voice whenever possible.

We do? I don't know that. What I know is that I choose voice based on the
situation.

John Posada
Special Projects; Information Technology
Barnes&Noble.com
NY: 212-414-6656

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE? "Mustang" is a NEW single
sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Linux "Severn"
Next by Author: Do you tell them?
Previous by Thread: Active voice / passive voice studies
Next by Thread: RE: Active voice / passive voice studies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads