RE: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers?

Subject: RE: Omitting Table and Figure Numbers?
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:03:59 -0400

>I recommend using the numbers.
>We recently added figure and table numbers
>to our documents.

I use numbering; one series for tables and one for figures. I continue
numbering from volume to volume.

Why?

My documentation is for internal consumption and it's more impressive to see
Table #658 or Figure #349.

:-)

John Posada
Information Hunter-Gatherer
Special Projects; Information Technology
Barnes&Noble.com
NY: 212-414-6656



****************************************************************************
**********************************
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE,
and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If
you are not an
intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and take the steps
necessary to
delete the message completely from your computer system.

Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transaction
Act or any other law of similar effect, absent an express statement to the
contrary,
this e-mail message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are not
intended to represent
an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise
intended to bind
this sender, barnesandnoble.com llc, barnesandnoble.com inc. or any other
person or entity.






Previous by Author: RE: Biomed - Wave of the Future - Evolve?
Next by Author: RE: Biomed - Wave of the Future - Evolve?
Previous by Thread: RE: Omitting table and figure numbers?
Next by Thread: RE: Omitting table and figure numbers?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads