Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization

Subject: Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:31:46 -0400


But surely he's heard of "know thy audience"! LOL.

___________________________
Bonnie Granat
Granat Editorial Services
http://www.editors-writers.info
Fast | Accurate | Affordable

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burns" <bburns -at- qds-solutions -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: September 19, 2003 12:13 PM
Subject: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization



I'm sure that Mark wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition when he brought up
this topic.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization: From: Bill Burns

Previous by Author: Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Author: Re: Farewell
Previous by Thread: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Thread: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads