Re: IEEE 12207 vs. MIL-STD-498

Subject: Re: IEEE 12207 vs. MIL-STD-498
From: JimGroark -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 08:32:51 EST


Joe,

Possibly the opening statements at this URL might help to clarify matters.

VR
Jim Groark

http://sepo.spawar.navy.mil/sepo/Standards.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

<< Subject: IEEE 12207 vs. MIL-STD-498
From: jsokohl -at- mac -dot- com
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:10:20 -0700
X-Message-Number: 2

[Note: This message applies probably just to those who are writing for the
U.S. military]
In a new tech writing position (though not a new field--12+years of
experience), I'm confronted with what looks like a mish-mash of
regulations & approaches. Some of the doc set I'm saddled with seems to
correspond to MIL-STD-498, other titles seem to conform to IEEE 12207.
Seems that my research indicates that 498's obsolete, having been
superceded by 12207.

Anyone have any ideas/experience/references for me? Short topic is that
I'm trying to bring the doc set into the 21st century and leave the 1970s
behind....

joe >>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER TRIAL NOW AVAILABLE!

RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or download a trial at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Sarbanes-Oxley
Next by Author: Slightly OT: Illustrator Question
Previous by Thread: IEEE 12207 vs. MIL-STD-498
Next by Thread: Re: IEEE 12207 vs. MIL-STD-498


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads