RE: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting

Subject: RE: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting
From: "James Jones" <doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:35:25 -0600


I used to be pretty fast (60 - 70 wpm). Now, because of disability, it's
15 - 25 wpm. But my reading, writing, and rithmetic (and translation
skill) are still pretty good. Happy New Year.

Jim Jones
OFF-SITE tech writing, editing, illustration, Chinese, German
translation, cartooning, small schematics, other
Doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net

-----Original Message-----

Michele Davis writes:

>
> Only check email every 10 minutes and keep your responses short (if
you're
> a slower typer). Me, eh, 120 wpm,

lyndsey amott:
I once did a typing test. After they subtracted all the errors, my score
was
13 wpm. No wonder I'm not getting anything done!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER TRIAL NOW AVAILABLE!

RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or download a trial at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting: From: lyndsey . amott

Previous by Author: q's abt Powerpoint, from a tech writer
Next by Author: Re: The Myth of Seven, Plus or Minus Two
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWRLing vs. techwriting


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads