RE: Best technical writing of the season

Subject: RE: Best technical writing of the season
From: Julia Williams <Juliaw -at- kiwiplan -dot- co -dot- nz>
To: 'TECHWR-L' <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:18:58 +1300

> From: Goober Writer [mailto:gooberwriter -at- yahoo -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:13 a.m.
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: Best technical writing of the season
>
>
>
> > >> "Mixing takes approximately three minutes for
> > >> non-pulpy juice or5 minutes for pulpy juice. "
> > >
> > > That makes no sense whatsoever. I like it!
> >
> > That manual was for a machine that makes emu juice,
> > which I've never tasted.
>
> Right, but how does MORE mixing *create* pulp?

Perhaps what matters is what the juice is like when it goes in, not its
state when it comes out. So, if you have pulpy juice, it takes longer to mix
than if you have non-pulpy juice.

Hmm, I should be working really ...

J




Previous by Author: RE: Converting Framemaker files - THANK YOU
Next by Author: Re: How can technical documentation add value?
Previous by Thread: Re: Best technical writing of the season
Next by Thread: Re: Best technical writing of the season


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads