Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

Subject: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
From: "Mike O." <obie1121 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:19:55 -0500

Michele Davis wrote:
> I realize I'll have to re-do my layout, Quark uses master pages as well,
> but the former designer didn't lay them out right (not enough
> information on the master pages).
> My client hates using a PDF as an editing tool. Recommendations on
> helping educate him? I so rarely use PDF for reviews I'm not sure what
> the advantage would be. This particular client likes to make last minute
> changes.

I wouldn't attempt to do revision control on a heavily laid-out DTP file...
perhaps you can educate them to review content in a simple word-processing
format, then import it into your DTP tool after the content is approved.
Separation of form and content, etc.

Mike O.

Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word: From: Goober Writer

Previous by Author: Re: You know you're an incurable tech writer when...
Next by Author: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads