RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver

Subject: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
From: "Chris La Porte" <cpldll -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "Rachael Lininger" <techwhirl -at- earthlink -dot- net>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:18:34 -0600

This may not be popular, but the newer versions of FrontPage are "good
enough" and you may already have a copy around, depending on which version
of Office y'all have. If you set FrontPage to be compatible with multiple
browsers and don't use its "extensions" it doesn't do badly. Plus, it is
easy to learn if you use other Microsoft apps.


> I am likely to need some web design package -- if for no better
> reason than that it's easier for me to spend hundreds on
> specialized software than to get a $ -at- #%^! freeware text editor
> approved. I could probably get either Dreamweaver or GoLive.
> Having never used either, I have no personal investment in a tool
> -- "good enough" is all I need. I'd kind of rather get GoLive,
> but not if it's still as unstable as the archives indicated in Jan 2003.
> Is GoLive CS stable and reasonable to use now?
> Thanks in advance!
> Rachael


GoLive vs. Dreamweaver: From: Rachael Lininger

Previous by Author: RE: Building a documentation knowledgebase
Next by Author: Re: GoLive vs. DreamWeaver
Previous by Thread: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
Next by Thread: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads