TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
What you describe is very close to the "Microsoft standard", which is:
"On the File menu, point to New and then click Task."
What is lacking from your example as opposed to MS is context, with a slight
confusion of order.
I used to be a big fan of "File > New > Task" and I still use it as
"shorthand notation", but I've pretty much adopted the MS convention for
delivered documentation. It's wordier but it's more accurate and easier to
wswallow "at" nycap "dot" rr "dot" com
::: -----Original Message-----
::: > There really needs to be some careful thinking done here,
::: and no just
::: > in the font. I wish writers and editors would invent
::: concise ways of
::: > conveying this stuff. I hate reading "Choose X in the Y menu, then
::: > choose Z". It's hard to follow.