RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver

Subject: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
From: jsokohl -at- mac -dot- com
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:37:27 -0700

Funny, but I'd strongly recommend GoLive if you are worried more about
designing pages, including interactivity. If you need
compatability/integration with PhotoShop, Illustrator, and/or InDesign,
then GoLive's the way to go. Too, on the Macintosh OS, GoLive is easier to
use than Dreamweaver, IMO.

If you need to integrate with Macromedia platforms such as Flash and
ColdFusion, then Dreamweaver's the way to go.

If you're on a Wintel-only environment and FrontPage came with your
computer, then use it.

If you're on a Mac and adept at coding and want to just write HTML and
quickly preview, then Bare Bones Software's BBEdit is still the way to go.
If you're on a PC and want to code plain text, then either textPad,
ultraEdit, or Programmer's File Editor (see to get these
tools) are quite nice.

Just my experience,


Previous by Author: Re: Is this a typical technical writing environment?
Next by Author: Re: Industry Standards Resource
Previous by Thread: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
Next by Thread: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads